satire
15 May 2008
The Budget for Dummies
Ben Pobjie cuts through the spin and gets right to the heart of the matter: how are you being screwed and what's the best way to complain about it?
Economics is a complicated matter. It has to be, so that economists can get people to talk to them. And economists' delusions of popularity are never so strong as in Budget week, a national celebration of the very best in our society, ie money.Every year Australians come together to celebrate the Budget in the traditional way: by reading several thousand articles titled "Winners and Losers" and whining about how there's not enough money for child care.
This Budget was of course particularly notable for the fact it was the first one delivered by new Treasurer Wayne Swan, following his predecessor Peter Costello, who handed down 400 Budgets and by the end was so relaxed and confident he took to juggling and performing magic tricks while doing so. His final Budget in 2007 was delivered entirely in Italian.
But Swan is only a rookie Treasurer, and so naturally we can forgive him his hesitancy and occasional stumbles and the fact he looks a bit like a greyhound. The good news is that Swan is proud of his Budget, and I think that's the main thing. According to Swan, it kicks off the "greatest modernisation of the architecture of the Australian economy...in our peacetime history", which is a relief, because to be frank, the last few modernisations of the architecture of the Australian economy were crap. Particularly during the Ralph Willis era, or as it is known among historians, "The Terror".
There are many opinions and analyses of the Budget circulating at the moment, all of them impenetrably dull and written by boring, generally worthless people. What the punters need is a simple, direct, manly guide to the Budget, one that cuts through all the spin and obfuscation and facts to get right to the heart of the matter.
The main thing people want to know about the Budget is how they're being screwed and the best way to complain about it.
The Government is, of course, focused on "working families", so lonely unemployed people are in the gun, and frankly it's about time they got what's coming to them. This is why, for instance, the Aged Pension has not been increased; because pensioners don't work, and most of them have no family due to their relatives all dying off or cutting them out of their lives due to the bitterness over the old people's appalling parenting. And so old people get nothing, and the natural balance is maintained.
Thanks to Bill Leak
The other big losers from the Budget will be those earning over $150,000 a year, as they will no longer be able to receive the baby bonus. It is naturally upsetting for one to find this out, and I think I speak on behalf of all those earning under $150,000 a year when I say: hahahahahahahahahaha. This is known as "the politics of envy", and while it is true that the Government's Budget is based on nothing more than a desire to punish success and attack those they do not like, it is also true that rich people are horrible.
"But Ben," I hear you say, in loud, braying tones, "$150,000 a year isn't rich. Why, we have our struggles like anyone else!" Which is true; for one thing, the Budget includes an increase in the luxury car tax, and if that doesn't fire a big flaming arrow straight through the twitching heart of the Australian Dream, then I don't know what does. This could be a precursor to cutting public funding for private schools, which would in many ways signal the end of civilised Australia as the population is washed away by an unstoppable tsunami of angry letters about how many overseas holidays people have given up in order to give their children the best possible chance at becoming insufferable snots. But I digress.
The point is, there is a real danger, as we know, in Budgets like these that remove benefits and raise taxes for the wealthy. The danger is that you will eliminate the incentive to be rich. Our capitalist society depends on people wanting to make lots of money, and when you take away minor welfare and make rich people pay more taxes, they won't want to make money any more. If we continue down this path, people will give up being rich. "It's too hard," they'll say. "What's the point in being rich, if you can't be a little bit richer? I'm off to Centrelink to live the $300-a-fortnight good life." And thus capitalism will collapse and we will be absorbed into a minor Chinese province, just as Kevin Rudd planned all along.
It is important for the observer to note that the spending cuts are about more than hating rich people and pensioners; they are designed to fight inflation, which is running at around 4 per cent, a level considered quite high in Australia, even though in many countries it would be evidence that the economy had fallen into a volcano. This is why the Government has worked very hard to achieve its Budget surplus of $21.7 billion, and why Wayne Swan and Kevin Rudd are at this very moment rolling around naked in a bathtub full of hundred dollar notes.
But it's not all doom and gloom. Perhaps the best news from the Budget is that $40 billion will be pumped into three huge funds for capital investment in infrastructure, health and education. What this will mean in practical terms is as yet unknown, but no matter what we get, at least we'll know it was expensive, and that should make us feel quite relaxed and comfortable about whatever bi-weekly literacy tests or drive-through triage centres loom on the horizon.
The most important thing to keep in mind is the Budget is not just a set of abstract figures on a few million sheets of paper; it is about living, breathing Australians. It is about you. This country is more than just an economy; there is also sport. And that's why it's important that you, the ordinary, inarticulate, unattractive citizens of Australia, let the Government know what you think of the Budget.
So go ahead, right now. Don't let highly intelligent columnists do all the opining, make sure your own stupid ideas are heard. Lift up your voices, in the name of budgetary democracy, before it's too late!
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Newsvine
Facebook
Kwoff
Discuss this article
To participate in the discussion Sign in or Register
Well done Ben, and beware the fool!
Great Job!
Sorry for my continuous ranting on the issue but the baby bonus was the Howard Governments way of silencing demands for paid mat leave.
I don’t think that the baby bonus is ‘good policy’ but in practice it is Australia’s version of paid mat leave (http://cpd.org.au/node/4617) and should thus not be classified as welfare and should thus not be means tested http://cpd.org.au/article/mean-tests-middle-class-welfare-or-redistribut…).
Tonia
Best analysis of the budget that I’ve read so far! Also the only one. But I feel that I don’t need any more, that said it all. :)
That infrastructure Fund has got the Big Business Developers absolutely salivating. Same with Coal Miners. So there were definitely some winners from Wayne’s Budget.
Just the poor bashed a bit more.
Even though Rudd admits he could not live on the Pension, it would seem that he expects Pensioners to live on his Hot Air for the next couple of years. Maybe they might die out, and save him some money. But the piss-poor opposition has nothing to offer either, they are saying that they may look at it in three years time! Obviously, Brendan and his mates have never tried living on Hot Air for long either. Do they give a dogs dropping..not likely!
The Climate was definitely not a winner either, and never will be with Garrett and Wong sitting in the ministerial chairs. What a waste of space they are, almost as much as Minister Macklin who apparently was an enthusiastic member of the Razor Gang, which explains the terrible result for Pensioners.
Dazza.
Man I hate the rich.
$150,000 is not rich dammit! Do you know how expensive foie gras for a family of four has become?
The good news is there is still some incentive to be a politician. The average pollie makes roughly $149,999.90 (at a guess).
www.thecomensalist.com
A warm and moving study by Bob Pobjie, but did it go far enough?
It saddens me that the brilliance of the Swan/Rudd economic strategy has not been more publicly illuminated, or appreciated as undoubtedly the most integrated socio-political measure ever to be to be implemented by a centrist government; at least since a now-obscure 1938 initiative in parts of Europe (identities of which, sadly, have evaded me since my flu inoculation).
With admirable focus, all aspects of funding-confluence target the next federal elections, whereupon revisionist sentiment will have all but dissipated; if not eliminated altogether.
Non-productive parasitical elements such as old age pensioners, carers, part time workers and the unemployed will by then be so nutrient-reduced that pneumonia will have mercifully released most long before the polls; and the decaying teeth and untreated medical conditions of those remaining will ensure a rash of collateral damages by that date. Cool.
This is precision budgeting and social engineering par excellence.
The other unproductive sector, already artfully brain-diminished by the mercury content of vaccinations and inoculations, will no doubt grow to be wonderfully uncomplaining automatons who will willingly work without wages or education. What a marvellous asset to the economy they will be.
A significant increase in health infrastructure is, we are given to understand, actually the mandatory mass inoculations and fluoridation programmes of the future; coupled with family planning.
All in all, one must admit, a job well done. I imagine I can already hear those echoing royal words… Arise Sir Wayne. I wish I could be there, but I am loyally sensitive to the jarring asymmetry and reduced aura of dignity my 65 year old presence would bring.
I will discreetly watch the event in the window of Radio Rentals.